GBNews published this video item, entitled “Trump’s team ‘have the goods’ to prove election results were rigged says Jan Halper-Hayes” – below is their description.
‘They have the goods, and Trump knew if he presented the evidence early on, there would be a civil war.’
U.S. Political analyst, Jan Halper-Hayes, argues that anyone who doesn’t think that the prosecutors have the ‘real results’ from the election are ‘fooling themselves.’
#trump #trumpcharges #donaldtrump #politics #latestnews
Keep up to date with the latest news at https://www.gbnews.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/GBNEWS
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/GBNewsOnline
Download the GB News app! You can watch GB News on all of your favourite devices and keep up to date with the latest news, analysis, opinion and more.
GBNews YouTube Channel
In a recent interview with GB News, U.S. political analyst Jan Halper-Hayes provided her insights into the allegations of election fraud surrounding the 2020 U.S. presidential election and discussed the potential ramifications of these claims.
The political analyst suggested that the accusations levelled at former President Donald Trump, though not yet reaching the severity of treason or sedition, may pave the way for a re-litigation of the 2020 election. This was because, as she stated, Trump’s right to due process has allowed him to subpoena witnesses and present evidence.
Halper-Hayes also touched upon the Executive Order issued by Trump in 2018, which outlined the consequences of foreign or domestic interference in future elections, specifically the 2020 election. According to Halper-Hayes, this directive signalled Trump’s prescience of potential election integrity issues. She also expressed concerns over the politicization of the legal system in the U.S., which she believes to be problematic.
The analyst further questioned the common narrative that the Trump campaign lost multiple court cases challenging the election results. According to Halper-Hayes, the truth is that out of 60 cases, only three were heard: Trump won two and lost one, while the rest were dismissed for lack of standing. She suggested that the media distorted these facts.
Drawing attention to the controversy surrounding Trump’s election fraud allegations, Halper-Hayes mentioned the 2000 mules film that documented suspicious activities at drop boxes in Georgia. She maintained that election integrity varies across states and that there might have been some machinations at play, but she refrained from making any explicit allegations.
Halper-Hayes also offered insights into Trump’s likely defense strategy, suggesting that it would be grounded in the First Amendment, defending his right to express his belief about the election results. She stressed that in a democracy, it’s crucial to respect the election outcomes, even if they’re disappointing.
She went on to mention recent whistleblower revelations that suggest dubious transactions involving Hunter Biden and Ukrainian energy company Burisma. The analyst presented these instances as examples of “Deep State” exposure that Trump has been keen to encourage.
Confronted with skepticism about Trump’s credibility, Halper-Hayes acknowledged Trump’s propensity to exaggerate but insisted he was a “straight shooter” when it came to his actions and plans. She contended that he was committed to reforming the U.S., going as far as to hint at Trump’s alleged intentions to dismantle the “U.S. Corporation” established in 1871 and return the country to being a republic.
These controversial remarks from Halper-Hayes are sure to stimulate further debate surrounding the 2020 U.S. presidential election and its aftermath. As the legal challenges continue, the analyst’s perspective offers a unique take on the events surrounding this ongoing political saga.
Got a comment? Leave your thoughts in the comments section, below. Please note comments are moderated before publication.
You can read Trump’s EO-13848, on September 12, 2018 here:
At govinfo.gov
content/pkg/FR-2018-09-14/pdf/2018-20203.pdf
It was with great difficulty that I managed to get through this entire ‘interview.’ She got a tiny handful of things correct – Joe Biden won the 2020 election and is the legitimate President of the United States. I can’t post the link but if you go to Business Insider and search for the complete list of Executive Orders, Actions, Memos, Proclamations you won’t find any EO (on (9/12/2018 or any other date) addressing a “US Corporation.” In fact, not a single EO/Action/Memo/Proclamation was issued during the entire month of September 2018.
Everything re: Burisma and the corrupt Ukrainian prosecutor has been thoroughly debunked – he was removed from office for NOT prosecuting corruption and it wasn’t just US policy that caused that to happen.
Voting machines were not compromised. The military doesn’t have “all the inside dirt” about alleged election interference. All parties with actual knowledge agree the 2020 election was the “safest and most secure election ever.” And the former guy knows he lost fair and square, he just refuses to admit it.
lol you’re funny
You didn’t look hard enough lol
To Whom it May concern,
Simply put a thorough investigation needs to be initiated NOW on the effect of the Dominion voting machine apparatus to include the Smartmatic software company and it’s connection to DNL and our vice president’s husband’s connection to the Dominion-Smartmatic companies.
From the minutes after the 4 or 5 States shut the polls down at around 10PM I knew something fishy was happening. TRUMP op by hundreds of thousands votes. Polls back up and running by 4AM Trump down by 8AM by thousands in those States. And all the other inconsistities I all ready new the election was rigged, like every thing else including banks and markets. The US is not a Capitalisric country any more but a deep state Industrial compex along with huge corporations doing their bidding!!!