The Ashes 2009 – Lord’s Day Two Preview

England and Australia will take to the field this morning with the second test match of The Ashes 2009 lying in the balance – England are batting and will restart with 364 for 6 wickets.

The picture could, and perhaps should, be much brighter for England after a great start was effectively erased when Kevin Pietersen, Paul Collingwood and Andrew Flintoff were caught and Cook and Bopara succumbed to straight deliveries LBW.

Bopara’s wicket in particular was a real sucker punch as the bowler sent one back the other way and the batsman was caught on a half stride.

Australia had started very poorly with the ball in hand, however, and will be hoping for better this morning in particular from Johnson who, despite his two wickets, was very expensive early on and took an age to find any rhythm – he has not looked like the bowler he was in the run-up to the Ashes.

Australian wicket keeper, Brad Haddin suggested that some players had been a little bit nervous at the start of the match, stating “the occasion at Lord’s maybe got to us,”.

This match will hinge around this morning’s session of play – whether Strauss can add to his impressive 161 and reach the double hundred his sensible batting yesterday deserves will depend largely on what movement the Australians can produce from this relatively flat wicket, and whether or not England have sufficient reserves to back up their captain.

If England do make it to lunch for one or two wickets then the match swings in their favour once more, as they’ll likely be posting a score of 450+ – the very least they should have expected from this pitch. If the hosts are out by lunch time, they could face a torrid three and a half days as the Australian team posses an embarrassment of riches in the batting department which could well post a huge total once more.

Early wickets are, therefore, vital to take, or protect.

If England do make it to lunch time and beyond, they give themselves a half chance in this match providing they can find inspiration with the ball that was so evidently lacking at Cardiff, however, the longer England bat on in this innings, on all evidence to date, it has to be said that this Lord’s test match starts to have the word “draw” written all over it.

This draw prediction rings particularly true if we look at the other imponderable feature of English cricket: the weather.

By lunch time, we should have a clearer picture. England must still be batting by then if they are to keep alive their hopes for a positive result in this test match.


In This Story: The Ashes

The Ashes is a Test cricket series played between England and Australia. The term originated in a satirical obituary published in a British newspaper, The Sporting Times, immediately after Australia’s 1882 victory at The Oval, its first Test win on English soil.

The competition alternates between England and Australia, who host every two years (this varies a little based on the Southern Hemisphere having summer during Northern Hemisphere’s winter), the Ashes is a series of five Test matches, which are each played over five days.

7 Recent Items: The Ashes

Searching for veterans’ ashes for two decades in Taiwan

‘The Ferryman of Souls’ helps ashes of veterans back home

Captain Cummins has the last laugh | Media Bites

Innings To Secure The Ashes! | Kevin Pietersen’s Superb 158 at The Oval | England v Australia 2005

Remnant 2: The Awakened King DLC – Official Launch Trailer

Turkey turns 100: A future global power? – BBC News

Remnant 2 – Official The Awakened King DLC 1 Teaser Trailer

Leave a Comment

We don't require your email address, or your name, for anyone to leave a comment. If you do add an email address, you may be notified if there are replies to your comment - we won't use it for any other purpose. Please make respectful comments, which add value, and avoid personal attacks on others. Links are not allowed in comments - 99% of spam comments, attempt to post links. Please describe where people may find additional information - for example "visit the UN website" or "search Google for..." rather than posting a link. Comments failing to adhere to these guidelines will not be published.