Coronavirus inaction: could leaders have blood on their hands? | UpFront (Headliner)

About This Source - Al Jazeera

The video item below is a piece of English language content from Al Jazeera. Al Jazeera is a Qatari state-funded broadcaster in Doha, Qatar, owned by the Al Jazeera Media Network. More from Al Jazeera

Three Recent Al Jazeera Stories:

  • George Floyd: Cop charged with murder, Minneapolis sets curfew
  • US police shoot and kill Black people at twice the rate of whites: Report
  • UN Security Council divided over Hong Kong
  • The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the coronavirus a pandemic this week as many
    countries expanded travel restrictions, shut down schools and universities and clamped down on large public gatherings in a bid to contain the virus.

    Speaking on Wednesday, WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said that in the past two weeks the number of cases outside China had increased 13-fold, and expressed deep concern about the spread of the virus. He also raised concerns about “alarming levels of inaction”.

    Eric Feigl-Ding, an Epidemiologist at the Harvard Chan School of Public Health told UpFront that he ranks the global collective effort to contain coronavirus at B minus, C plus.

    “I think testing in Korea is absolutely gold standard. But testing in the United States is absolutely abysmal,” Feigl-Ding said.

    When asked whether some world leaders potentially have blood on their hands for failing to take action to contain the virus Feigl-Ding said “I think so”.

    As of March 8, South Korea had 3,500 tests per million people, the UK had 350 tests per million. In the U.S, according to figures from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, there had been just 5 tests per million. Feigl-Ding said the lack of testing in the U.S. in particular was a serious problem.

    “You need the testing to do contact tracing, who were they in contact to, locking down, isolation, and that’s why without that testing and the investigative team footwork, you cannot contain this epidemic,” Feigl-Ding said.

    Feigl-Ding believes containment is key, and that people should keep to any quarantines that have been imposed, avoid public spaces and practice social distancing.

    “Unfortunately, I think in certain ways, you have to do extreme social distancing…like all the sports games, public venues. But the draconianness [sic] of China, I don’t know, because they have the Wuhan lockdown, but they also have residential lockdown for 750 million,” Feigl-Ding said.

    In this week’s Special Interview, Epidemiologist Eric Feigl-Ding lays out what measure he thinks need to be put in place to contain the spread of the coronavirus.

    Follow UpFront on Twitter @AJUpFront and Facebook.

    Leave a Comment